Local

A state-level scorecard will be published weekly on Sundays right here on Project Minnesota for all counties, with highlights from standout cities or towns making strides to improve integrity.

Help your county bring back integrity to elections and the overall operations of government.

I (Erik) will personally focus on expanding the PER hand counts.

Thank you for stepping up in favor of election integrity—this is a statewide effort and yet the work is local.

• 2020 raised eyebrows
• 2021 saw the beginning of local, county level and then city-level engagement through Rick Weible's leadership.
• 2022 saw Sec of State Steve Simon ignore the Crow Wing County Board's resolution to audit their county's 2020 election
• 2023 saw the coverup of cast vote records (and ballot images) in most counties
• 2023 saw the Legislature mandate electronic tabulators in precincts that previously used them and banned ballot images from public disclosure
• 2024 saw the Legislature make yet more changes, including banning hand counting immediately after polls close
• There have been no serious audits for decades—especially of details like 1) tabulator logs, 2) cast vote records, and 3) ballot images, for any Minnesota primary or state general election [and one post election review in Dakota County for 2020 was missing more than half the ballots]

With transparency narrowing, what can citizens do?

We can become the trusted advisors to our town boards, city councils, and county commissions—it's an obligation to share what we know and the path to elections with integrity.

Your townships, cities, and counties have decision-making authority on several key areas:

1. Expanding the postelection review (PERs) to include as many precincts as possible and as many contested races on the ballot as possible
   1. This resolution has already passed in two cities in Anoka County - Oak Grove and Ramsey
2. If have mail-in only precincts, reversing prior decision and return to in-person voting in precinct - View sample resolution
   1. This resolution already succeeded in Stearns County - Collegeville
3. As a town or city, partnering with the county to take responsibility for receiving, accepting/rejecting, counting, and tallying any absentee, early, and mail-in ballots/votes
   1. This resolution has already passed in one city in Crow Wing County - Crosslake
4. Passing a resolution to ensure that no city employees are used for absentee ballot boards (at the county level), but instead only party-balanced election judges
   1. Alert erikvanmechelen@protonmail.com if your county is not using party-balanced absentee ballot boards
5. Counties can revert back to electing a county auditor (local oversight) if they have previously decided to appoint that position
   1. Alert erikvanmechelen@protonmail.com if your county currently appoints their auditor - see how Morrison County citizens defended against the threat of an appointed County Auditor
6. Redrawing precinct boundaries to allow for the decision to be made once again whether (or not) to use electronic equipment
   1. As seen in MS 206.58 AUTHORIZATION FOR USE. Subd. 1 Municipalities. ''Once a municipality has adopted the use of an electronic voting system in one or more precincts, the municipality must continue to use an electronic voting system for state elections in those precincts.'' (emphasis added)
7. When redrawing precinct boundaries in #6, precinct sizes can be capped at a certain number of voters to assist with logistics, planning, and training of election judges and poll workers
8. Opting out of the KNOWiNK (BPro) electronic pollpads (e-pollbooks) given their internet connectivity and integrated feature set (if desired, use paper pollbooks instead to check-in voters)—it appears that e-pollbooks can both monitor and modify election data and results
9. Opt out of electronic tabulators IF county staff cannot provide:
   1. sufficient testing
   2. cast vote records
   3. validation of ballot images creation (even though ballot images may currently not be shared with public)
   4. also consider asking for a modem audit of tabulators
   5. note that unlike some states, by statute only the Office of the Secretary of State is needed to certify electronic equipment and it is not necessary to test all equipment (therefore many tabulators and other equipment may go untested)
10. Conduct a parallel hand count and human hand tally on election day*

*It appears that the 94th Legislature (2024) will introduce a new subdivision in MS 204C.20 BALLOTS; NUMBER TO BE COUNTED. which will hinder this idea, even though it is not strictly speaking illegal. (It would be surprising for the legislature to outlaw hand counting given that it is the default backup plan in case of electronic outages.)

#1-8 above are currently legal, but that can change. If pursuing any of the above and facing resistance, ask oneself: Why should anyone object if the goal is a secure, transparent, verifiable, and accessible election and these approaches are within the currently written election codes?

If the laws change in response to your efforts, then so be it. Never give up.

What's the first step?

Familiarize yourself with your township board or city council. (If in very small county, consider starting with county commissioners.)

The main goal is to find a true leader.

If you are not already attending meetings, go to the next one. Feel out the lay of the land.

A few questions to observe or even ask directly:

• Who are your city council members?
• What is their level of understanding about election law, process, and electronic systems?
• How are they staying informed about election-related news?

You will be helping the leader you find to navigate their options—cities and towns have more authority to increase integrity than they sometimes know. Your job is to help them learn about their options.

Find Your Groups

It is possible to take the first step alone—Mim did—but sometimes it helps to have one or two others to work alongside you.

Maybe you are already meeting face to face with others interested in this topic and moving the needle locally? As has been going on in Anoka since 2021/2.

Learn more about how to find your group. Or contact us to see if we are already connected with someone in your area.

Next Step: Bringing Resolutions to Cities and Towns

Groups like the Anoka County Election Integrity Team (ACEIT) have done a lot of the legwork when it comes to resolutions that can be brought to town and city boards.

Crucially, they even helped the City of Oak Grove and the City of Ramsey to pass resolutions to expand their post election review (PER) hand counts for additional precincts and down ballot elections.

Learn more about ACEIT's success here in this video report from Liz Collin:

Still have questions on getting started or getting connected? Email us.

Remember, YOU, as the election integrity advocate, are the TRUSTED ADVISOR—it is our obligation to inform our cities, towns, and counties the reality of the situation with our elections and how they can be improved.

A state-level scorecard will be published weekly on Sundays right here on Project Minnesota for all counties, with highlights from standout cities or towns making strides to improve integrity.